White Space Strategy: How to Win by Ending the Compromise

Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Most categories force this compromise—and the brand that removes it wins.

The Tradeoff Trap

Think about buying running shoes. You want cushioning that protects your joints on long runs. You also want a lightweight, responsive feel for speed work. And if you’re like me, you want a large toe box that doesn’t squeeze your feet.

I say this all the time: I want Hoka and Altra to have a running shoe baby. Maximum cushion meets natural foot shape. But the market makes me choose.

Most brands force the same compromise: maximum cushion (heavy, sluggish) or minimal weight (harsh, unforgiving). Wide toe box or performance stack height.

That daily frustration when you’re picking which pair to wear? That’s a lived tension.

A lived tension is the compromise your customers repeatedly make because the category gives them no better option.

It’s not a theoretical problem. It’s a daily annoyance, a small frustration, a quiet “why can’t I just have both?”

When customers feel that tension often enough, they start looking for a brand that removes it.

That is the white space.

Why “Better” Doesn’t Differentiate—But “Both” Does

Most brands compete on improvement:

• Faster

• Cheaper

• Stronger

• Easier

• Smarter

But “better” only makes you a stronger option in the same category. It doesn’t make you different.

Better puts you in the race. Both ends the race.

When you’re “better,” customers still comparison shop. When you deliver “both,” you create a new category where you’re the only option.

What White Space Actually Looks Like

Unbound Merino

Tradeoff: Professional vs. Comfortable
Most travel or casual clothing looks relaxed but not polished. Most professional clothing looks sharp but feels stiff.

White space: Clothes that look professional and feel like your most comfortable basics.

Because: Merino wool performs across temperatures, resists odor naturally, and maintains structure without stiffness—eliminating the need to pack separate wardrobes for work and leisure.

Notion

Tradeoff: Powerful vs. Simple
Traditional productivity tools were either extremely powerful but complex, or simple but limited.

White space: A tool that is deeply powerful, visually simple, and flexible.

Because: Modular blocks let users build exactly what they need without confronting features they don’t—power scales with user sophistication rather than forcing it upfront.

Tesla

Tradeoff: Performance vs. Sustainability
Electric cars were once slow, unattractive, and “eco-only.”

White space: A car that is high-performance, desirable, and sustainable at the same time.

Because: Electric motors deliver instant torque and superior acceleration—making environmental responsibility the performance advantage rather than the sacrifice.

The Pattern in Apparel

Notice how this shows up everywhere in the industry:

Technical outdoor: Performance vs. Style
Brands like Arc’teryx dominate mountain performance but look like you’re always ready to summit. Brands like Outdoor Voices nail everyday style but won’t hold up on a real trail.

Sustainable fashion: Eco-friendly vs. Affordable
Sustainable materials cost more. Most brands either compromise on materials to hit price points or price themselves out of reach.

Activewear: Outdoor-specific vs. All-day wearable
Compression and performance fabrics excel in the gym but don’t transition to everyday life. You’re stuck changing or accepting you look like you just left the gym.

Natural fiber: Sustainable vs. Performance
Cotton breathes but holds moisture. Synthetics wick but aren’t biodegradable. Merino bridges some gaps but comes with price and durability tradeoffs.

Workwear: Durable vs. Professional
Carhartt-level durability looks too rugged for client meetings. Professional fabrics don’t survive job sites. Separate wardrobes for separate contexts.

The entire industry has trained customers to accept these splits as inevitable.

This is where brands like Stio find opportunity. Their move into footwear wasn’t random—they saw the gap between indoor comfort and outdoor capability and built the Colter mountain slipper right into that white space.

The brand that refuses the compromise wins the category.

The White Space Formula

Use this structure to uncover your own positioning:

“Most brands force users to choose between X and Y. We deliver both because…”

Examples in action:

“Most sustainable apparel forces you to choose between eco-friendly materials and technical performance. We deliver both because our recycled merino blend wicks moisture like synthetics while being fully biodegradable.”

“Most technical jackets force you to choose between weatherproof protection and breathability. We deliver both because our membrane structure blocks rain while allowing vapor to escape—keeping you dry from outside and inside.”

How to Find Your Category’s Tradeoff

To uncover the tension your customers live with:

1. Listen for the word “but” in customer conversations
“I love X, but it’s always…”
“This works great, but I wish…”

2. Watch what they buy separately
What products do they use in combination to get the full solution? Those gaps between purchases reveal the compromise.

3. Notice what they apologize for
“This isn’t perfect, but at least it…”
“I know this looks/costs/takes too long, but…”

These patterns reveal the compromises they’ve accepted as inevitable.

Find Your White Space

The signals are there—in customer complaints, combination purchases, and apologetic compromises. But identifying them is one thing. Translating them into defensible positioning is another. I’ve created a **White Space Worksheet** to help you: ✓ Identify the tradeoff your customers are tired of making ✓ Map your competitive landscape to reveal gaps ✓ Craft your white space statement with the “because” that makes it credible ✓ Validate whether you’ve found real opportunity or wishful thinking The worksheet includes apparel-specific examples, fill-in exercises, and a validation framework to pressure-test your positioning before you build.

Why This Matters Now

Category convergence is accelerating. Features that used to differentiate quickly become table stakes. Technical specs alone rarely create lasting moats.

But solving a fundamental tradeoff? That creates space only you can occupy—until someone finds an even better way to integrate what seemed incompatible.

The brands winning today aren’t just better at what exists. They’re redefining what’s possible.

Why I Built This Framework

I work with sustainable apparel brands from concept to market—usually brought in to either shape an entire product line or identify white-space opportunities for new categories. This year, I kept hearing the same question from founders: “How do we know if this idea will actually differentiate us?” They could describe their products in detail—fabric specs, construction methods, and sustainability metrics. But they struggled to articulate the tradeoff their product eliminates. That gap—between what you make and what you compromise on—is where most positioning falls apart. I built a framework to help brands make product decisions with greater clarity and integrity. The white space formula is the foundation.